County profile

Partially sourced

Hood County

Hood County now uses the official county commissioners route as the primary county-office anchor for unincorporated-area due diligence. Tiny home, RV, off-grid, container-home, ADU, water, septic, access, and building-permit feasibility should still be confirmed through county staff, municipality checks, ETJ/subdivision review, groundwater district review, private covenants, and parcel-level research before purchase.

County-level researchedParcel review requiredLand availability signal

Profile boundary

County Profiles Do Not Approve Parcels

This profile summarizes county-level signals. Before relying on a parcel, verify current rules with planning, zoning, building, environmental health, water, road, fire, title, and local professionals.

Read disclaimer

Verification queue

What Still Needs Confirmation

This profile has official source coverage for county-level discovery, but it still needs stronger current county-office confirmation before being promoted to verified. Treat it as a shortlist candidate, then confirm the exact parcel and intended use with local offices.

Office path

Current county contact

Confirm who handles planning, subdivision, rural addressing, floodplain, permitting, and enforcement for the parcel.

Parcel path

Exact intended use

Ask about the specific structure, RV or camper occupancy plan, water source, septic path, access road, and development sequence.

At a glance

Fast Read

County-level discovery summary for alternative housing research. Use this as a shortlist signal, then verify the specific parcel and code path.

Verify first
Overall

Mixed discovery fit

Hood County has a Freedom Score of 55. Its strongest profile signals are ADUs (4/5) and Tiny homes (3/5).

Best use case

Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex rural land screening

Best initial fit: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex rural land screening, Texas county-office due diligence, parcel-level alternative living research. Check county planning materials before making parcel assumptions.

Land signal

20/100 affordability score

$40,698 per acre snapshot with 523 active land listings and a 5/5 availability signal.

Caution

Mixed county-level signal

Do not treat this Texas source pass as parcel approval

Lifestyle indexes

Decision Signals by Goal

These indexes translate the county data into practical shortlisting signals for common alternative-living goals. They are discovery scores, not parcel approvals.

Methodology
Housing Freedom Index58

Tiny homes, RV living, ADUs, container homes, and land cost signals.

Off-Grid Freedom Index70

Off-grid score, solar, rural land availability, low density, and utility friction.

Homestead Freedom Index69

Land affordability, availability, growing season, density, and water-climate signals.

Land Affordability Index20

Price-per-acre snapshot, land availability, and county-level tax burden context.

Connectivity Index84

Broadband proxy, wired access, cellular reliance, and remote-work suitability.

Trust strip

Source Snapshot

Fast source context for this county profile. Use the full source trail below for links, citations, and parcel-level verification reminders.

Data status
Land snapshotsourced
Jun 11, 2026

LandWatch

Broadbandsourced
2024

Census Reporter ACS 2024 5-year table B28002

Public landsourced
2026

USGS PAD-US Manager Type GIS layer

Solar periodsourced
2001-2020

NASA POWER 2001-2020 solar irradiance climatology

County citationssourced
20

Planning, zoning, building, and profile links

Best Fit

Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex rural land screeningTexas county-office due diligenceparcel-level alternative living research

Pros

  • https://hoodcounty.texas.gov/government/county_commissioners/index.php provides a county-specific official source anchor for county-office routing
  • TCEQ OSSF, TWDB/TGPC private-well, and TDLR industrialized-housing resources support statewide due diligence
  • this record can be compared against climate, solar, broadband, public-land, tax, and land-market layers already collected
  • Hood County development materials define development permits broadly and connect development review to subdivision plats, grading, OSSF, floodplain permits, and mobile home permit requirements.

Cons

  • This is a source-anchor pass, not a county-office confirmation or zoning interpretation
  • Texas authority can vary sharply between unincorporated county land, cities, ETJs, subdivisions, groundwater districts, floodplain areas, colonias, and private covenants

Alternative Housing Ratings

derived

Verified county-level discovery scores

Tiny Homes
3/5
RV Living
3/5
Off Grid
3/5
Container Homes
3/5
ADUs
4/5

Alternative Housing Notes

Tiny Homes

Hood County development materials define development permits broadly and connect them to grading plans, subdivision plats, development plans, OSSF permits, and floodplain development permits. Mobile homes require the same permits needed to build a house, so tiny home and manufactured-home concepts should be confirmed with Development, OSSF, floodplain, city/ETJ, and private-covenant reviewers.

RV Living

RV living in Hood County should be checked against Development FAQs, development permit regulations, OSSF requirements, floodplain permits, utility access, city or ETJ authority, and subdivision restrictions. Confirm whether a proposed use is temporary occupancy, construction support, park-style development, or full-time residence.

Off Grid

Off-grid projects in Hood County should begin with development permit regulations and OSSF materials. Confirm septic, private water, floodplain, grading, access, roads, utilities, and municipal or subdivision limits before relying on acreage.

Container Homes

Container-home projects in Hood County should be reviewed as dwelling or structure proposals through county staff and any applicable municipality. Engineering, foundation, wind, flood, egress, insulation, utilities, sanitation, driveway access, and local code adoption may matter.

ADUs

ADU feasibility in Hood County is parcel-specific. Confirm zoning or subdivision controls, primary-dwelling status, occupancy limits, building review, utilities, septic or sewer capacity, access, municipal jurisdiction, ETJ issues, and private covenants.

Land Affordability

sourced

Sourced market snapshot

Price/Acre Estimate
$40,698
Active Land Listings
523
Availability Score
5/5
Affordability Score
20/100

Source: LandWatch snapshot from June 11, 2026. LandWatch county page snapshot. Active listing count is from the county page title/metadata; medianAcrePrice is the median asking price per acre from visible page listing data (25 nonzero sampled listings), not a full-market median or appraisal.

How to read source layers

Population Context

sourced

Sourced Census estimate

Population
69,126
Population Density
164.3 / sq mi

Population uses 2024 U.S. Census county estimates. Density is computed from county land area in the imported GeoJSON boundary data.

Water and Septic

draft

Parcel-level verification needed

Water

Water availability in Hood County is parcel-specific. Texas private-well due diligence should include TWDB/TGPC resources, groundwater conservation district rules where applicable, well yield, water quality, drought exposure, hauled-water feasibility, and public-water service availability.

Septic

Hood County has an OSSF order and development materials linking permits to on-site sewage facility review. Confirm current OSSF process, soils, setbacks, water-source separation, floodplain, inspections, and maintenance requirements.

Climate, Utilities, and Access

derived

Mixed sourced and derived layers

Snowfall
0.1"
Precipitation
34.5"
Growing Season
317 days
Broadband
9/10
Solar
8/10
Public Land
792
Recreation Access
2/5
Federal Public Land
0
State Public Land
261
Local Public Land
532

Public land source: USGS PAD-US Manager Type GIS layer snapshot from 2026. County-clipped GIS estimate using PAD-US 4.1 manager type records for Texas. Includes federal, state, local, and district-managed polygons; excludes tribal, NGO, and private-managed records. This is a discovery-level public/protected lands estimate, not a parcel-level access determination. Sample matched labels: Acton State Historic Site; Acton State Park; City Beach Park; De Cordova Bend Park; Granbury Boat Ramp; Granbury Dog Park; Hewlett Park; Hunter Park; Lambert Branch Park; Monument Park; Moore Street Community Park; Moore Street Open Space; Pearl Street City Park; Railroad Waterfront Park; Reunion Grounds; Rough Creek Park; Shanley Park; Soccer Field; The Jim Burkes Firefighter Memorial Park; Thorp Spring Park.

Broadband Subscription
93.4%
Cable/Fiber/DSL
74.7%
Satellite
13.3%
No Internet
5.2%

Broadband source: Census Reporter ACS 2024 5-year table B28002 snapshot from 2024. Broadband score is a county-level ACS household broadband subscription proxy, not parcel-level service availability. Score is based on the percentage of households with broadband of any type.

Annual Solar Resource
4.84 kWh/m²/day
Winter Solar
3.08 kWh/m²/day
Summer Solar
6.66 kWh/m²/day

Solar source: NASA POWER 2001-2020 solar irradiance climatology for 2001-2020. County-centroid solar proxy using NASA POWER ALLSKY_SFC_SW_DWN annual all-sky surface shortwave downward irradiance. This is a county-level solar resource estimate, not a parcel-level PV design study.

Source glossary and data layer notes

Red Flags

  • Do not treat this Texas source pass as parcel approval
  • verify jurisdiction, permits, subdivision platting, manufactured-home or modular-home treatment, sanitation, private well or water service, legal access, floodplain, wildfire or grassfire response, easements, agricultural restrictions, utility easements, and whether the parcel is inside a city, ETJ, special district, groundwater conservation district, colonia, or private development.

Source Trail

County office links, sourced data layers, and profile citations used to build this county-level research summary.

Source glossary

County Profile Citations

Research Status

draft

County-level profile reviewed; parcel-level confirmation still required

This profile is currently marked partially sourced. It is ready for county comparison and early research, but legal claims and parcel-specific decisions should still be verified against county code, planning offices, and local experts.

County FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hood County a good county for alternative living?

Hood County has a Freedom Score of 55, which makes it useful for county-level discovery. Treat that score as a shortlist signal, then verify zoning, building, water, septic, access, and covenant rules for the specific parcel.

Can you live in a tiny home in Hood County?

Hood County has a tiny home score of 3/5. That score does not approve a tiny home by itself; it means the county is worth researching through planning, zoning, building code, sanitation, and parcel-specific rules.

Can you live in an RV on land in Hood County?

Hood County has an RV living score of 3/5. RV rules often depend on duration, construction status, sanitation, water, zoning district, and whether the land is inside a subdivision or municipality.

Is Hood County good for off-grid living?

Hood County has an off-grid score of 3/5. Off-grid feasibility still depends on legal access, septic or OWTS approval, water options, fire risk, winter access, and whether a lawful dwelling can be permitted.

How affordable is land in Hood County?

Hood County has a land affordability score of 20/100 based on the current county-level dataset. Use this for comparison only, because actual parcel prices can vary by road access, utilities, terrain, water, covenants, and listing quality.

Who is Hood County best suited for?

Based on the current profile, Hood County is best suited for Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex rural land screening, Texas county-office due diligence, parcel-level alternative living research. The best fit can change once you narrow from county-level research to a specific property.

What should I verify before buying land in Hood County?

Before buying, confirm zoning, building permits, legal access, road maintenance, water rights or well eligibility, septic feasibility, wildfire requirements, floodplain issues, mineral rights, and any HOA, POA, subdivision, or covenant restrictions.

Research Next