Current county contact
Confirm who handles planning, subdivision, rural addressing, floodplain, permitting, and enforcement for the parcel.
County profile
Partially sourcedClark County
Clark County has a first-pass Wisconsin source-discovery record. Tiny home, RV, off-grid, container-home, ADU, water, septic, shoreland, wetlands, floodplain, access, and building-permit feasibility should be confirmed through the county, town, city, or village, DSPS or DNR resources where applicable, subdivision documents, private covenants, and parcel-level research before purchase.
County-level researchedParcel review requiredOff-grid research candidateLand availability signal
Profile boundary
County Profiles Do Not Approve Parcels
This profile summarizes county-level signals. Before relying on a parcel, verify current rules with planning, zoning, building, environmental health, water, road, fire, title, and local professionals.
Verification queue
What Still Needs Confirmation
This profile has official source coverage for county-level discovery, but it still needs stronger current county-office confirmation before being promoted to verified. Treat it as a shortlist candidate, then confirm the exact parcel and intended use with local offices.
Exact intended use
Ask about the specific structure, RV or camper occupancy plan, water source, septic path, access road, and development sequence.
At a glance
Fast Read
County-level discovery summary for alternative housing research. Use this as a shortlist signal, then verify the specific parcel and code path.
Mixed discovery fit
Clark County has a Freedom Score of 57. Its strongest profile signals are Off-grid living (4/5) and Tiny homes (3/5).
Central Sands and Driftless screening
Best initial fit: Central Sands and Driftless screening, county, town, city, and village zoning research, buyers comparing Wisconsin counties before narrowing to a local jurisdiction and parcel. Check county planning materials before making parcel assumptions.
49/100 affordability score
$16,978 per acre snapshot with 87 active land listings and a 4/5 availability signal.
ADUs needs extra review
do not treat this Wisconsin source pass as parcel approval
Lifestyle indexes
Decision Signals by Goal
These indexes translate the county data into practical shortlisting signals for common alternative-living goals. They are discovery scores, not parcel approvals.
Tiny homes, RV living, ADUs, container homes, and land cost signals.
Off-grid score, solar, rural land availability, low density, and utility friction.
Land affordability, availability, growing season, density, and water-climate signals.
Price-per-acre snapshot, land availability, and county-level tax burden context.
Broadband proxy, wired access, cellular reliance, and remote-work suitability.
Trust strip
Source Snapshot
Fast source context for this county profile. Use the full source trail below for links, citations, and parcel-level verification reminders.
Land snapshotsourced
Jun 12, 2026LandWatch
Broadbandsourced
2024Census Reporter ACS 2024 5-year table B28002
Public landsourced
2026USGS PAD-US Manager Type GIS layer
Solar periodsourced
2001-2020NASA POWER 2001-2020 solar irradiance climatology
County citationssourced
19Planning, zoning, building, and profile links
Best Fit
Pros
- Wisconsin statewide county-zoning, shoreland, floodplain, building-code, POWTS, well, wetlands, and waterway sources support a consistent first-pass review
- Northwoods, central sands, and Driftless counties may offer stronger rural-land screening signals than Milwaukee, Madison, and southeast suburbs
- this record can be compared against climate, solar, broadband, public-land, tax, and land-market layers already collected
- Wisconsin source route now separates county planning/zoning authority from DSPS POWTS, Uniform Dwelling Code, sanitary permit, zoning, or local building follow-up.
Cons
- this is a source-discovery pass, not a county, town, city, village, DSPS, DNR, sanitary, or building-code confirmation
- county-level screening is limited because local zoning, shoreland rules, POWTS septic, wells, wetlands, floodplain, access, private restrictions, and parcel conditions often control the final answer
- lakeshore rules, wetlands, private roads, winter maintenance, snow load, lake associations, and local ordinances can materially change rural land feasibility
Alternative Housing Ratings
derived
Verified county-level discovery scores
Alternative Housing Notes
Tiny Homes
Use the listed Wisconsin county-zoning, DSPS POWTS, Uniform Dwelling Code, and county follow-up routes to confirm tiny-home placement, zoning district, minimum dwelling or construction standards, permits, utilities, wastewater, and municipal or subdivision restrictions for the exact parcel.
RV Living
Long-term RV occupancy should be confirmed with the county, town, or local jurisdiction because zoning, sanitation, camping, nuisance, floodplain, utility, and subdivision rules can differ by parcel.
Off Grid
Off-grid feasibility should be checked against Wisconsin POWTS rules, well or water access, road access, floodplain exposure, fire response, electric service choices, and any county, town, or municipal permitting rules.
Container Homes
Container-home feasibility depends on zoning use classification, building-code review, structural documentation, foundation standards, inspections, and whether the jurisdiction treats the project as modular, manufactured, or site-built construction.
ADUs
ADU rules are often city, town, county-zoning-district, or subdivision specific in Wisconsin; verify accessory dwelling, guest house, and secondary residence rules before relying on county-level signals.
Land Affordability
sourced
Sourced market snapshot
Source: LandWatch snapshot from June 12, 2026. LandWatch county page snapshot. Active listing count is from the county page title/metadata; medianAcrePrice is the median asking price per acre from visible page listing data (25 nonzero sampled listings), not a full-market median or appraisal.
Population Context
sourced
Sourced Census estimate
Population uses 2024 U.S. Census county estimates. Density is computed from county land area in the imported GeoJSON boundary data.
Water and Septic
draft
Parcel-level verification needed
Water
Water availability in Clark County is parcel-specific. Buyers should verify public-water service, private-well feasibility, water quality testing, well-construction rules, lake or river setbacks, wetlands, floodplain, and shoreland zoning constraints.
Septic
Septic feasibility in Clark County requires parcel-level POWTS review through the county or designated governmental unit, including soils, setbacks, replacement area, water-source separation, shoreland setbacks, wetlands, floodplain, slope, and seasonal high-water constraints.
Climate, Utilities, and Access
derived
Mixed sourced and derived layers
Public land source: USGS PAD-US Manager Type GIS layer snapshot from 2026. County-clipped GIS estimate using PAD-US 4.1 manager type records for Wisconsin. Includes federal, state, local, and district-managed polygons; excludes tribal, NGO, and private-managed records. This is a discovery-level public/protected lands estimate, not a parcel-level access determination. Sample matched labels: Black River State Forest; Central Park; Clark County Forest; County Forest Land; Dalton'S Park; Eau Claire County Forest; Farm Service Agency Interest Of Wi; Grassland Reserve Program (GRP), Clark, WI; Jackson County Forest; Jay Nikolay Fields; Northeastern States District Office; Red Arrow Park; Rem-Black River; Rem-Dickenson Creek; Scattered Wildlife - Wd; Statewide Public Access; Statewide Public Access - Wd; Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), Clark, WI.
Broadband source: Census Reporter ACS 2024 5-year table B28002 snapshot from 2024. Broadband score is a county-level ACS household broadband subscription proxy, not parcel-level service availability. Score is based on the percentage of households with broadband of any type.
Solar source: NASA POWER 2001-2020 solar irradiance climatology for 2001-2020. County-centroid solar proxy using NASA POWER ALLSKY_SFC_SW_DWN annual all-sky surface shortwave downward irradiance. This is a county-level solar resource estimate, not a parcel-level PV design study.
Red Flags
- do not treat this Wisconsin source pass as parcel approval
- verify county and local zoning, building permits, POWTS septic, well or public-water availability, DNR wetlands and waterway permits, shoreland zoning, floodplain zoning, legal access, covenants, easements, lake-association rules, and subdivision restrictions before buying land
Source Trail
County office links, sourced data layers, and profile citations used to build this county-level research summary.
Official County Links
Data Layer Sources
LandWatchLand market snapshot from June 12, 2026U.S. Census county estimatesPopulation and density contextUSGS PAD-US Manager Type GIS layerPublic land acreage snapshot from 2026Census Reporter ACS 2024 5-year table B28002Broadband household subscription proxy from 2024NASA POWER 2001-2020 solar irradiance climatologyCounty-centroid solar resource for 2001-2020
County Profile Citations
census.govhttps://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.htmlcensus.govhttps://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/carto-boundary-file.htmldocs.legis.wisconsin.govhttps://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/59.69docs.legis.wisconsin.govhttps://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/59.692docs.legis.wisconsin.govhttps://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/87.30dsps.wi.govhttps://dsps.wi.gov/Pages/Programs/UDC/Default.aspxdsps.wi.govhttps://dsps.wi.gov/Pages/Programs/POWTS/Default.aspxdnr.wisconsin.govhttps://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/Wellsdnr.wisconsin.govhttps://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/ShorelandZoning/Programs/programs.htmldnr.wisconsin.govhttps://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/Wetlandsdnr.wisconsin.govhttps://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/Waterways/permitFAQlandwatch.comhttps://www.landwatch.com/wisconsin-land-for-sale/clark-county/for-salepropertytaxexplorer.comhttps://propertytaxexplorer.com/us/wisconsin/clark-county/services.arcgis.comhttps://services.arcgis.com/v01gqwM5QqNysAAi/ArcGIS/rest/services/PADUS_Manager_Type/FeatureServer/0data.rcc-acis.orghttps://data.rcc-acis.org/GridDatadata.rcc-acis.orghttps://data.rcc-acis.org/MultiStnDataapi.censusreporter.orghttps://api.censusreporter.org/1.0/data/show/acs2024_5yr?table_ids=B28002&geo_ids=05000US55019power.larc.nasa.govhttps://power.larc.nasa.gov/api/temporal/climatology/point?parameters=ALLSKY_SFC_SW_DWN&community=RE&longitude=-90.70437026666667&latitude=44.77665879999999&start=2001&end=2020&format=JSONdnr.wisconsin.govhttps://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/Wastewater/DefineLargePOWTS.html
Research Status
draft
County-level profile reviewed; parcel-level confirmation still required
This profile is currently marked partially sourced. It is ready for county comparison and early research, but legal claims and parcel-specific decisions should still be verified against county code, planning offices, and local experts.
County FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Clark County a good county for alternative living?+
Clark County has a Freedom Score of 57, which makes it useful for county-level discovery. Treat that score as a shortlist signal, then verify zoning, building, water, septic, access, and covenant rules for the specific parcel.
Can you live in a tiny home in Clark County?+
Clark County has a tiny home score of 3/5. That score does not approve a tiny home by itself; it means the county is worth researching through planning, zoning, building code, sanitation, and parcel-specific rules.
Can you live in an RV on land in Clark County?+
Clark County has an RV living score of 3/5. RV rules often depend on duration, construction status, sanitation, water, zoning district, and whether the land is inside a subdivision or municipality.
Is Clark County good for off-grid living?+
Clark County has an off-grid score of 4/5. Off-grid feasibility still depends on legal access, septic or OWTS approval, water options, fire risk, winter access, and whether a lawful dwelling can be permitted.
How affordable is land in Clark County?+
Clark County has a land affordability score of 49/100 based on the current county-level dataset. Use this for comparison only, because actual parcel prices can vary by road access, utilities, terrain, water, covenants, and listing quality.
Who is Clark County best suited for?+
Based on the current profile, Clark County is best suited for Central Sands and Driftless screening, county, town, city, and village zoning research, buyers comparing Wisconsin counties before narrowing to a local jurisdiction and parcel. The best fit can change once you narrow from county-level research to a specific property.
What should I verify before buying land in Clark County?+
Before buying, confirm zoning, building permits, legal access, road maintenance, water rights or well eligibility, septic feasibility, wildfire requirements, floodplain issues, mineral rights, and any HOA, POA, subdivision, or covenant restrictions.